描述:
This report first explains that the Confuciansim preached 'Tao' and 'Te', while Lao Tzu 'Tao Te Ching.' Both schools emphasized 'Tao' and 'Te', which is something like the main idea of an article. If there is 'Essay Eye,' then 'Tao' and 'Te' must be the key words between the both. Secondly, it is reported that the Confuciansim took 'Chou-yi' as the head of six Chings, while the Tao emphasized Yi, Lao, and Chuang at the same time and saw Chou-yi the heritage of the Tao. It caused a sensation that Mr. Chen, ku-yin advocated 'Yi-zuan' as the thoughts of the Tao. Two schools of thoughts claims differently about it. Whether 'Chou-yi' belongs to the Confuciansim or the Tao? Therefore, this paper tries to analyze and compare 'Tao' with 'Te' in Chou-yi based on two schools of thoughts: those who thought Chou-yi belongs to the Tao such as Fann geng yan, Lii jing chyr, Gan heng, Chern guu ying, and etc. while others thought Chou-yi belongs to the Confuciansim such as Ch'eng-Chu, Day lian jang, Jin chuen, Jang lih wen, and so on. It is found that not only are the explanations of Tao and Te between them very different, but the thinking approaches are also. They are especially different in 'Yi-zuan.' So, the 'Tao' and 'Te' theories of the Confuciansim and the Tao vary at the very beginning. If we had such an understanding at this point, we would not get confused about them.